Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:13

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Inbox: This will be a tough roster to crack - Green Bay Packers
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why is my ex still keeping in touch with me even though she dumped me?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Renault CEO and architect of Alpine F1 project stepping down - The Race
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Red Sox’ Roman Anthony already has done something Alex Bregman hasn’t - MassLive
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How did Madri, mother of Nakula and Sahadeva die?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What causes you to be tired all the time and major headaches?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Top prospects for 2025 Draft arrive in Buffalo for Scouting Combine - NHL.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Kelley Wolf hospitalized by officers 'against my will' days after revealing divorce - USA Today